Broad meadows

In the last installment, I wrote about the trivial matters that law enforcement places its emphasis that are meant only for the benefit of the “justice” system as means of financial support without having any bearing on public safety. Having to come to a complete stop when the way that is clear makes no sense and clearly doesn’t deserve public sanction. And this is what I mean when I assert that a government agency, any government agency should not be allowed to impose sanction of any kind if they cannot show a harm to someones body, property or (undeservedly) reputation.

As irritating as nonsense laws such as these are, what is allowed is even worse. In what will go down as one of the most unjust things the Supreme Court has ruled on is the matter of abortion, the murdering of the unborn. A clear harm has been allowed to occur to a human being with the government’s protection and encouragement. It’s a disgusting ruling that’s based really on nothing. So let’s examine what can be known about the status of the child in utero.

The first issue to examine is whether or not the entity under consideration is alive. As it provably has DNA and is growing and not decaying, we can assume it is alive. Is it the mother or father’s DNA? No. This eliminates the “my body, my choice” argument. The mother’s DNA is clearly different. Is it human? Again, the DNA says that it is human. Gestation is clearly a process that all humans must go through. There can be no argument left affirming the procedure except “because I want to” and that’s not a good enough reason for something to be legal when a human life is destroyed. How long did it take to come to this inescapable conclusion? And yet the slaughter is allowed to continue. In practice, it is no different than child sacrifice practiced in ancient history. According to accumulated sources, around a half billion people have been killed worldwide by this “procedure “.

Another thing that is never really spoke of in terms of its legality is what I would call blood oaths. What I mean by that is when a group requires any new members to swear an oath under penalty of death. The first thing that comes to mind is that this not any type of official entity, but a private organization. Specifically, from what I’ve read from their own writings, are the Masons. So they are threatening someone’s life if they divulge any of the secrets of that organization. Exactly why would this be legal? And what secrets are being kept under such stiff penalties? What is this “Great Work” and why would it be secret if beneficial to mankind? Perhaps the reason there is no investigation is that they have invaded institutions to accomplish their mission, whatever it may be. For instance, there’s a Masonic order of police.

Where the problem comes in in a situation such as this is that they also swear an oath when they join the “public sector.” Which oath would they uphold? Which one would you uphold if the penalty for breaking one of the oaths was death? You can see how this would be a conflict of interest. Why it is called the public sector is that there is meant to be an openness to the process and motivations that the public must be allowed to view and comment on the work being done by public entities.

Good works don’t require secrecy, only an explanation of its intent and benefits in the public sector. Only evil deeds need the cover of secrecy. Often times the phrase “means and methods” are used as excuse for such secrecy. A case might be made for that if there were any tangible results to point to. But we sit at this point in time without any investigation into the plot to unleash the Covid shot on humanity. Not even a mention in public circles. Despite an overwhelming amount of evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election no official inquiries have begun. Immunity has been given to people in government who have not even been officially charged with any crimes, a de facto admission of guilt, and still nothing. And this after the people got the elected president that they wanted in 2024 and still nothing.